Monday, May 19, 2008

Urge Senators to Keep GSE Funding for the Housing Trust Fund

URGENT CALL TO ACTION FROM NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION!
[This is the action we discussed in the Coalition Forum on Thursday!]

Call Now Before Tuesday’s Markup. The fight to protect resources for an affordable housing trust fund will continue next Tuesday, May 20, in the Senate Banking Committee. After yet another delay in the markup of Senator Dodd's major housing bill, we still have time to convince the Committee leadership to abandon their efforts to siphon Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac money from the Housing Trust Fund. Reports indicate that a "deal" between Banking Committee Democrats and Republicans would give away GSE resources for the Housing Trust Fund to pay for the potential costs of the proposed new FHA foreclosure prevention program.

We must stand firm and make our voices heard in order to keep the GSE funds dedicated to the Housing Trust Fund.

ACTION NEEDED NOW:

IF YOUR SENATOR IS ON THE BANKING COMMITTEE
Urge your senator to keep the GSE funding for a Housing Trust Fund as outlined in Reed Amendment #3, and NOT to use it to pay for the new FHA program.

Click here for members of the Senate Banking Committee and their phone numbers.

IF YOUR SENATORS ARE NOT ON THE BANKING COMMITTEE
Urge your senators to contact Banking Chair Dodd and Ranking Member Shelby, asking them to keep the GSE funding for a Housing Trust Fund as outlined in Reed Amendment #3, and NOT divert the funds to the new FHA program.

Click the blue "Take Action" button above for the names and numbers of your senators.
The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee will consider Chairman Christopher Dodd's bill, "The Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008" this Tuesday, May 20, at 10:00am EDT.

Thank you again for all of your support and dedication during this protracted campaign to establish an affordable housing trust fund.

PS: Please email us at outreach@nlihc.org, or call us at 202.662.1530, to report the results of your calls. Any information we can gather from you could be very valuable as the bill moves forward.

Background:
At a time when the federal government can guarantee a $30 billion bail-out of Bear Sterns and pay for a $25 billion bail-out of the home builders, it is incomprehensible that Congress would take away money intended to help low income people -- all in the name of protecting the taxpayers from the potential $1.7 billion risk in the new FHA program.

On May 13, Senator Jack Reed (D-RI) offered an amendment to the larger Dodd housing bill that was accepted in the manager's package. The "Reed Amendment #3" will: Create a Housing Trust Fund with funding from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Target 75% of the funds to benefit extremely low income people. Enable the Housing Trust Fund to accept other funds that Congress designates in the future. The Reed Housing Trust Fund amendment will make it possible to achieve the major objectives of the National Housing Trust Fund Campaign in the context of this major housing bill.

The Senate Banking Committee began considering the bill on May 15 and should finish marking up the bill on May 20. The time to act is now.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Capitol Hill - Wrap Up of Legislation in First Session of 110th Congress

Congress to Return to Full AgendaTo kick off the New Year, we have rounded up the major housing policy issues we expect Congress to work on in 2008, the second session of the 110th Congress. While progress was made in 2007, there is much unfinished business for 2008. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Chair Christopher Dodd (D-CT) formally dropped out of the presidential race on January 4. The pace of that committee’s work is now expected to increase.

The House and Senate will return for legislative business on January 15 and 22, respectively. The president will deliver his state of the union address on January 28. On February 4, the president will deliver his FY09 budget requests to Congress, which will mark the official start of FY09 budget and appropriations season.

National Housing Trust FundThe National Housing Trust Fund made great progress in the first session of the 110th Congress. On October 10, under the leadership of House Committee on Financial Services Chair Barney Frank (D-MA), the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund Act of 2007, H.R. 2895, passed the House with strong bipartisan support (see Memo, 10/12/07). On December 19, Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) were the lead sponsors along with six other Senators in introducing bipartisan legislation to establish a housing trust fund in the Senate (see Memo, 12/21/07). The Senate bill, S. 2523, is very similar to the House version and has been referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. In 2008, the National Housing Trust Fund Campaign will work to get additional cosponsors and line up votes to have the trust fund bill passed in the Senate.

Both the House and Senate bills would establish dedicated sources of funds for the production, preservation and rehabilitation of 1.5 million affordable homes over the next 10 years. At least 75% of the funds will be for housing for households that are extremely low income, earning less than 30% of the area’s median income.

There are two sets of current legislation that have seen action in the first session of the 110th Congress that establish funding sources for the trust fund. First, the House passed H.R. 1427 (see Memo, 5/25/07) a comprehensive reform bill for the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that also calls for providing dedicated funds from the GSEs to the trust fund. In the Senate, Senator Jack Reed (R-RI) has introduced S. 2391, the GSE Mission Improvement Act of 2007 (see Memo, 11/30/07) that includes funds from the GSEs to support an affordable housing fund. This measure has been referred to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs. GSE reform legislation (S. 1100) introduced by Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) on April 12, 2007, does not contain the affordable housing fund provision. Comprehensive GSE reform is expected to be taken up by the Senate Banking Committee sometime this year.

A second source of revenue for a trust fund is included in House-passed legislation to modernize the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), H.R. 1852 (see Memo, 9/21/07). The bill creates new FHA revenue by expanding the home equity conversion mortgage (HECM) program and dedicating some of this new revenue to a Trust Fund. The Senate has passed a similar modernization measure for the FHA, S. 2338, but it does not include the funding provision (see Memo, 12/14/07). The two measures now must go to a House-Senate conference committee where differences in the bills will be reconciled. The National Housing Trust Fund Campaign will work to see that the FHA provision providing funding for the Trust Fund remains in the final legislation.

Budget and AppropriationsPresident George W. Bush signed the FY08 omnibus spending bill, which includes funding for HUD, on December 26. The House and Senate had passed three continuing resolutions to keep government spending flowing in FY08 after the October 1, 2007, start of the fiscal year came and went.

With 2008 an election year, the process for enacting FY09 spending bills could be even more partisan. On February 4, the president will deliver his FY09 budget request to Congress, which will mark the official start of FY09 budget and appropriations work. The House and Senate Budget Committees will work to enact an FY09 budget resolution by April 15 and then use the spending levels and directives in that document to guide the work of the appropriations committees and subcommittees.

Advocates’ work in this area will begin with seeking a higher domestic discretionary spending limit, compared to FY08, in the FY09 budget resolution. Such an increase would enable the House and Senate Appropriations Committees to allot additional funds, compared to FY08, to their subcommittees, including the Transportation, HUD and Related Agencies Subcommittees. Of course, keeping any gains made by a better budget resolution will be possible only with enough votes to push back against any cuts or requests for level funding proposed by the president’s budget, a task that proved impossible for the FY08 appropriations.

Public HousingThe biggest challenge facing public housing in 2008 will be sufficient funding to operate and maintain existing public housing units. Funding for both functions in recent years has lagged well behind need. Today’s public housing authorities are operating on only 85.4% of what HUD knows they need to operate, according to the November 14 paper by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, and their more than $20 billion backlog of capital needs is widely known.

Legislation to reauthorize the HOPE VI program is likely to receive additional attention in 2008. The House is expected to take up its HOPE VI reauthorization bill, H.R. 3524, the week of January 14. The bill, introduced by House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity Chair Maxine Waters (D-CA), passed out of committee on September 26 (see Memo, 9/14/07 and 9/28/07). The Senate bill, introduced on March 6 by Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) received a hearing in the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee on June 20 but no further action has been taken on the legislation (see Memo, 3/9/07 and 6/22/07). The bills are very different from one another. The House bill requires one-for-one replacement of units, a right to return by former residents and many other protections and improvements long sought by advocates. The Senate bill does not contain any of these improvements and reverses some of the gains won when the program was last reauthorized in 2003 under legislation sponsored by Representative Mel Watt (D-NC).
Section 8 Housing Choice VouchersAdequate funding to renew all vouchers and to fund vouchers that are currently authorized but unused will continue to be critical issues for the FY08 HUD appropriations bill. Advocates will also continue to ask for new vouchers in FY09. The approximately 20,000 vouchers funded in the FY08 HUD appropriations bill for homeless veterans, non-elderly disabled people and the family unification program were the first new vouchers funded since FY02. In FY09, advocates will continue to seek 100,000 additional new vouchers.

The Section 8 Voucher Reform Act will be a focal point for advocacy in 2008. The House bill, H.R. 1851, includes a long list of important and positive reforms to the voucher program, and advocates will work hard in 2008 to enact this legislation. H.R. 1851 passed the House on July 12 (see Memo, 7/13/07), but the Senate bill has yet to be introduced. A draft Senate bill was circulating in the Fall of 2007 and introduction is expected shortly after January 22, when the Senate returns to work.

H.R. 1851 addresses the distribution of voucher funds to administering agencies, simplification of rents, voucher portability, replacement vouchers for lost project-based assistance, project-based vouchers, fair market rents, rent burdens, inspections, the moving to work/housing innovation program and the family self-sufficiency program, among other voucher issues. The bill also authorizes 20,000 new, incremental vouchers each year for FY08 – FY12.

Project-Based Housing PreservationWhile Congress considered some legislation to preserve existing affordable housing in the first session of the 110th Congress, the main thrust of preservation legislation will occur in the second session. On October 31, the House Committee on Financial Services, chaired by Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), passed H.R. 3965, the Mark-to-Market Extension and Enhancement Act of 2007 (see Memo, 11/2/07). This legislation would amend the Mark-to-Market program to include properties with below-market rents and to expand the number of instances of nonprofit debt relief, among other changes. The Congressional Budget Office concluded, in a report dated November 30, 2007, that these expansions of the program would have a direct spending cost, potentially triggering a rule of the House of Representatives that would prohibit consideration of the bill without offsetting revenue increases.

In addition, on October 31, the Committee approved H.R. 3873, the Section 515 Rural Housing Property Transfer Improvement Act of 2007, by voice vote. The bill is intended to expedite the transfer of Section 515 rural multifamily housing projects from one owner to another. The Senate did not take up any preservation legislation in the first session.

Chair Frank is expected to introduce a major preservation bill in February, and he has committed to moving this legislation though the Financial Services Committee early in the second session. This legislation is likely to include many of the provisions sought by advocates and the Preservation Working Group. In addition, the non-cost provisions of H.R. 3965 may be included. Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY), chair of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation and Community Development, is also expected to introduce preservation legislation.

Low Income Housing Tax CreditWhile no legislation has been formally introduced as yet, House Committee on Ways and Means Chair Charles Rangel (D-NY) is looking at ways to improve the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program (LIHTC). And, House Committee on Financial Services Chair Barney Frank (D-MA) is working on ways to better coordinate the HUD programs with the LIHTC program. Legislation developed by both members will be part of a larger tax reform measure that Mr. Rangel plans to consider in the second session of this Congress.

NLIHC is working to promote deeper income targeting for the LIHTC program as well as a better distribution of the credits in order to house more extremely low income families.
In other LIHTC news, the House rejected attempts to include a provision to exclude military service members’ basic allowance for housing from their calculation of income for purposes of determining eligibility for the low income housing tax credit program, in its legislation providing military service members additional tax benefits (see Memo, 11/2/07). The Senate amended its version of this bill on December 19 to include this provision. NLIHC opposes this action as it would take units away from low income civilians and the responsibility for housing for active military people lies with the Department of Defense.

McKinney-Vento Reauthorization Bills have been introduced in both the House and Senate to reauthorize McKinney-Vento homeless programs. The bills would consolidate all HUD McKinney-Vento housing programs, except Emergency Shelter Grants, into one competitive program with a broad set of eligible activities, including homelessness prevention, permanent or transitional housing for any homeless population, and supportive services.

On February 6, Representatives Julia Carson (D-IN), Geoff Davis (R-KY), Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Rick Renzi (R-AZ) introduced H.R. 840, the Homeless Emergency Assistance and Rapid Transition to Housing Act (HEARTH) (see Memo, 2/9/07). Ms. Carson passed away on December 15, and Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) is expected to carry McKinney-Vento legislation through the committee.

Ms. Waters, chair of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development, held two hearings on the bill in October, 2007 (see Memo, 10/12/07 and 10/19/07). S.1518, the Community Partnership to End Homelessness Act of 2007, was introduced by Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Wayne Allard (R-CO) on May 24 (see Memo, 5/18/07 and 5/24/07). The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs voted in favor of S. 1518 on September 19 (see Memo, 9/21/07).

Each bill would expand the definition of homelessness, to different degrees. In S.1518, households would be considered homeless for the purposes of receiving services if they: are living in somebody else’s housing because they do not have the resources to obtain other housing; have been notified that the arrangement is short-term; have moved either three times in the past year or twice in the past three weeks; and are not contributing significantly to the cost of the housing. The definition would also include people who have moved frequently (three times in the past year or twice in the past 21 days) and are currently living in a hotel or motel in which they will not be able to stay for more than a brief period. The definition of homelessness in H.R. 840 would be more closely aligned with the definition used by other federal agencies by including people who are living in doubled-up situations or in hotels/motels due to lack of adequate alternatives.

A Senate floor vote on S. 1528 is as yet unscheduled. The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity is expected to mark up a manager’s amendment of H.R. 840 in the spring.

Disaster RecoveryS.1668, the Gulf Coast Housing Recovery Act of 2007, remains stalled in the Senate due to opposition by Senator David Vitter (R-LA). The bill, introduced by Senators Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and Christopher Dodd (D-CT) on June 20 (see Memo, 6/22/07), would, among other things, require that any redevelopment of public housing owned by the Housing Authority of New Orleans (HANO) or any Gulf Coast public housing agency (PHA) include one-for-one replacement and a right to return for all displaced tenants. Companion legislation, H.R. 1227, passed the House on March 21 (see Memo, 3/23/07). Advocates continue to push for S.1668 to be voted on the Senate Banking Committee. In the meantime, Senator Landrieu may soon introduce new legislation related to New Orleans public housing that would better reflect the negotiations and compromises made thus far on S.1668.

Another supplemental spending bill for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will be taken up by Congress in late winter. As with past supplemental spending bills, this will be an opportunity for additional funds to be allocated to Gulf Coast housing recovery.

Legislation to revise the Stafford Act, particularly the way the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) responds to temporary and long term housing needs after a disaster, will be introduced by Senator Landrieu in late winter or early spring.

Off to Rough & Tumble Start: Senate Shields Vetoes from 12 House Salvos

By James Salzer, Ben Smith - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution - Published on: 01/15/08

The Georgia House took a historic shot at Gov. Sonny Perdue on the first day of the 2008 session Monday by voting overwhelmingly to override a dozen bills he vetoed last spring.

But just as it had done in a similar situation at the end of the 2007 session, the state Senate came to Perdue's rescue and stalled the move. The Senate postponed any decision about joining the House in overriding the vetoes.

That delay will give Perdue time to lobby senators to oppose the House revolt, just as they did last year on his veto of a $142 million tax rebate.

Even so, the House's defiance suggested that this year's legislative session could be even more rancorous than last year's.

After the votes, Perdue spokesman Bert Brantley said, "Today's actions are yet another example of House leadership insisting on making a statement rather than making the state better.

"Georgians expect us to address serious issues facing this state and work together to solve problems, not create disputes between the branches of government."

House members denied afterward that they were renewing the political war with Perdue that began with last year's tax-bill veto.

"I don't know that it's really a signal [to Perdue]," Speaker Pro Tem Mark Burkhalter (R-Johns Creek) said. "It's more the House simply reasserting its position, some positions it felt strongly about."

The House did not consider trying to override Perdue's veto of the $142 million tax rebate because the money was part of the fiscal 2007 budget. Fiscal 2007 ended June 30, so that money is no longer available.

Among the vetoes overridden were for bills that:

- Made it less likely the state would take away college book allowances from HOPE scholars.

- Gave tax breaks to the builders of Cobb Energy Performing Arts Center, Encore Park in Alpharetta and large-scale tourist attractions.

- Made it easier for lawmakers to get financial information from state agencies.

The House vetoes violated an unwritten tradition of legislative decorum. Historically, the first day of the session is a day for backslapping and welcome-back speeches.

"I've been here 33 years," Rep. Bob Hanner (D-Parrott) said, "and I've never seen anything like it."

The Legislature last overrode vetoes —- on relatively minor bills —- 34 years ago.

After the 2007 session, Perdue vetoed 41 bills and budget appropriations.
Lawmakers were particularly irate about Perdue's decision to redirect funding on more than a dozen separate appropriations they had approved. Essentially, Perdue kept the money in the budget but told state agencies to ignore the directions the General Assembly gave them on how to spend it.

House leaders are planning to file legislation this session in hopes of keeping the governor from taking such action again.

Most of the vetoes the House sought to undo Monday were on bills approved by unanimous votes in the General Assembly last year.

In general, fewer than two dozen House members sided with the governor Monday on any of the override votes.

Democrats joined the Republican majority in supporting the override effort after meeting in the morning.

"Our motto has been that, if you see a good fight, get out of the way," House Minority Caucus Chairman Calvin Smyre (D-Columbus) said. "But we felt . . . we should stand up on these issues."
Even before the voting was over, Speaker Glenn Richardson (R-Hiram), sounded as if he knew that the Perdue-friendly Senate would at least temporarily foil the House's plans.

"The Constitution requires them to immediately consider [the overrides] and not to play a game," Richardson said. "But I predict the other body that took an oath may well shirk their responsibility and not address these matters."

Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, who presides over the Senate, said the veto overrides would be considered individually by the Senate Rules Committee. The committee might, or might not, send them to the full Senate for a vote.

"The bottom line is that these bills have broad statutory and budgetary impact," Cagle said, "and we need to fully weigh the perspectives of the governor and the House prior to a floor vote."
Staff writer Andrea Jones contributed to this article.

Can’t we all get along?

by Tom Crawford - From Capitol Impact's Georgia Report - 1/15/2008 - http://www.ciclt.net/garpt/

Sonny Perdue shared the stage with Glenn Richardson and Casey Cagle at the Georgia Chamber of Commerce’s annual “Eggs & Issues” breakfast Tuesday, and the most newsworthy development was that the trio avoided hitting or throwing food at each other.

“We weren’t sure what we were going to see after 12 overrides of vetoes,” Chamber President George Israel said, referring to Monday’s historic votes in the House of Representatives, engineered by Speaker Richardson, to override a dozen Perdue vetoes from last year.

The trio of elected officials were all on their best behavior as they talked to the business audience about the upcoming legislative session, although Cagle included some veiled criticisms of the ongoing squabbling between Perdue and Richardson.

“At the end of the day, Georgians want results and they don’t care who gets the credit,” Cagle said. “We need to act on principles and stop acting on politics.”

“I am certainly not interested in playing games; I am ready to move our state forward,” Cagle added in a speech that sounded more like a kickoff for the 2010 governor’s race.

“All I know is, there’s a job to do,” said Richardson, who contended that he, Perdue and Cagle all share a “common goal” of helping Georgians. “We’re going to talk, we’re going to agree, and we’re going to disagree.”

One specific topic addressed at the breakfast was the attempt by NRA lobbyists to get a bill passed that would make it illegal for businesses and employers to adopt policies that prohibit employees from bringing guns to the workplace. The bill is staunchly opposed by the Georgia Chamber and other business groups as an intrusion upon private property rights.

“The Georgia Chamber has never not supported the Second Amendment, and we are not promoting any legislation that would lessen gun owners’ rights,” said Charles Tarbutton, the chamber’s chairman. “What we do oppose strongly is the NRA’s attempt to expand gun owners’ rights at the expense of private property rights and employers’ rights.”

Tarbutton urged elected officials to focus on more substantive issues like water and transportation “and not become distracted with what we think is a narrow special interest of the NRA that appears more to be a solution looking for a problem.”

“Our constitution is great, but when we try to make one constitutional right greater than another, we run into problems,” said Perdue, who added that “the NRA is my friend.”
“I implore both sides to come together . . . make sure these constitutional rights don’t collide with one another,” Perdue said.

Georgia Legislature 2008: A Look at the Issues

Stacy Shelton, Craig Schneider, James Salzer, Ariel Hart, Ben Smith, Andrea Jones, Bridget Gutierrez - The Atlanta Journal-Constitution - Published on: 01/14/08

The 2008 edition of the Georgia General Assembly, which opens in Atlanta this morning, faces a host of serious election-year issues, from long-range water planning and funding for Grady Memorial Hospital to the proposed elimination of property taxes to fund schools.
An overview of the top topics:

WATER - Water is back as one of the Legislature's top priorities, nearly two years into one of the worst droughts ever recorded in North Georgia.

Whatever gets decided will not happen soon enough to address metro Atlanta's current water crisis. Only rain and the federal government, which operates the region's major water supply reservoirs, can fix it.

But top leaders already have promised state funds to help build more reservoirs for the future. And legislators will vote on a 92-page policy guideline and to-do list that lays out how the state —- acting through 11 water districts —- will spend the next three years determining how to divide Georgia's lakes, streams and underground aquifers.

Just as important as the document will be the funds attached to it. One estimate for the work needed is $36.5 million, to be spent on a variety of data gathering.

Top Republican leaders, including the governor, and the business community are leading the charge, but they expect a fight. More than almost any other issue in Georgia, water is a true dividing line between metro Atlanta and the rest of the state. —- Stacy Shelton

GRADY - Grady officials are hoping the state Legislature creates and funds a statewide trauma care network, which could contribute millions of dollars to the financially-strapped hospital.
Grady officials, who operate the state's busiest and most sophisticated trauma unit, want to see as much as $30 million from the passage of permanent funding for the state's trauma units. In December, House Speaker Glenn Richardson (R-Hiram) proposed to help fund the trauma network with a $10 annual fee on vehicle registrations. Also, Gov. Sonny Perdue has proposed additional fines on "super speeders" to help fund the network. —- Craig Schneider

TAXES - Property taxes will be one of the most debated topics of the 2008 session, especially during the early part of the session.

House Speaker Glenn Richardson (R-Hiram) is pushing a plan to eliminate most school property taxes and replace the lost revenue with a sales tax that covers more goods and services. Richardson's plan is expected to be considered early in the session by the House.

Its chances of passage are iffy at best because it includes a proposed constitutional amendment. To get the proposed amendment on the ballot, Richardson would need two-thirds of the House and Senate to support it. He also is seeking legislation to freeze property values at tax time. That would essentially freeze property taxes unless local cities, counties or school districts raise millages.

Several other similar proposals are being floated by lawmakers. Meanwhile, Gov. Sonny Perdue will continue to promote his bill to eliminate taxes on retirement income for upper-income retirees. The Senate has passed the bill, but the House has held off because it wants more broad-based tax reform.

Speaker pro-tem Mark Burkhalter (R-Alpharetta) is backing Richardson's proposal. If it doesn't pass, however, Burkhalter wants lawmakers to look at his bill to eliminate property taxes on cars. —- James Salzer

TRANSPORTATION - One of the biggest transportation votes is expected to come at the beginning of the session: the payback attempt against two members of the state Transportation Board by House leaders furious because of their votes for the new transportation commissioner. Mike Evans and Raybon Anderson, who voted for the governor's candidate over the speaker's candidate, are among five DOT board members up for re-election by caucuses of state legislators.

In legislation, to tax or not to tax is still the question. Two big transportation funding bills last year —- one regional, one statewide —- went into a study committee. The committee's recommendation is expected soon, but it not only is an election year but also a year in which some local officials will be trying to protect their own special purpose local option sales taxes that are up for renewal.

Among other possible bills, safety officials are girded against attempts to repeal red-light camera laws, which they say save lives. —- Ariel Hart

SEX OFFENDERS - The debate whether sex offenders can be barred from living and working within 1,000 feet of churches, schools and day-care centers returns to the Georgia Legislature.
State Rep. David Ralston (R-Blue Ridge) wants to reinstate the distance requirement that the Georgia Supreme Court struck down in November.

The high court ruled the ban unconstitutional because it could deprive an offender of the right to own property. Before the court's ruling, a homeowner listed on the state's sex offender registry could be forced to move if a church, school or day-care center opened within 1,000 feet of his house.

Ralston, who chairs the House Judiciary Non-Civil Committee, proposes exempting such property owners from the residency restriction.

But civil libertarians say Ralston's proposal also is unconstitutional because it doesn't exempt renters or institutionalized people. Thus, offenders could be forced out of half-way houses and hospices if a children's center were to open inside the 1,000-foot buffer. —- Ben Smith

SUNDAY SALES - Sunday sales of beer and wine are being pushed again by stores, but the chances of getting a bill through the General Assembly this session are not good.

Last year, officials for grocery and convenience stores pushed legislation that would have allowed local voters to decide on the sale of beer, wine and liquor at stores on Sundays.

Conservative Christian groups opposed it, as did some prominent liquor store owners who do not want to have to pay Sunday payrolls while facing competition from groceries and convenience stores. The measure stalled in the Senate, with supporters blaming a liquor store owner with ties to Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle, who presides over the Senate.

Proponents note that Georgia is one of just a few states with a total Sunday sales ban, and they say more and more of their customers shop on Sundays. However, it will be a tough sell in an election year, when most lawmakers try to avoid the issues that rile up key groups of voters. —- James Salzer

GUNS - A battle over gun bills is sure to erupt in the legislature this year, with the National Rifle Association throwing its full support and resources behind one bill and Georgia gun owners and some lawmakers backing another. The NRA is backing a bill that would allow employees to keep handguns in their cars at work. Rep. Tim Bearden (R-Villa Rica) filed a broader bill that would expedite firearm permits and allow gun owners to carry concealed weapons in many more places. —- Andrea Jones

EDUCATION - Always a major issue, education funding will receive renewed attention this year as advocates of public schools try to protect campuses from potential changes in Georgia's tax structure and in the way state funds are distributed.

Educators are waiting to see if Gov. Sonny Perdue will continue cutbacks, first started in fiscal 2003. Metro Atlanta school systems lose millions of dollars every year to Perdue's "austerity reductions" —- losses they make up for through property taxes.

The governor's Education Finance Task Force, charged with redoing the k-12 funding formula, is suggesting that systems be allowed to spend state money where needed, rather than where told. If legislators can't remedy the finance problem, a judge could step in. A lawsuit by rural systems, which claims that state officials are not adequately funding schools, is scheduled for trial in September.—- Bridget Gutierrez